Gitflow develop branch behind master after a release Gitflow uses branch and merge patterns in a way that a developer cannot make the mistake you describe other than by varying from gitflow (and doesn't need to rely on brittle analysis of "branch behind" counts to avoid it) Of course gitflow isn't the only way, but it is what you asked about
Why we shouldnt merge main branch to develop branch in gitflow? In gitflow It suggests we should merge release 0 0 1 to the main branch and then merge to the develop branch Once the release is ready to ship, it will get merged it into main and develop, then the release branch will be deleted
git - How to install GitFlow for Windows - Stack Overflow Is there a way to install Git Flow on Windows? I tried this tutorial but I'm unable to understand it I already have Git Installed on my PC, can I use GitFlow from my current Git installation?
GitFlow: How to maintain previous releases? - Stack Overflow A suggestion we received was to use the GitFlow scheme This scheme can be put on a chart as follow: However, I have one question about how to manage a specific case Because of our activities, we have to maintain previous versions that our customer may still be using and does not want to update for various reasons
GitFlow: merge to master first or after prod release? This varies from one team to the next I've worked on teams that exactly follow the GitFlow description, and others that choose to just delete release and recreate it from develop as if it was the first time Deploy to prod and then merge release into master?; or Merge release to master and then deploy to prod?