companydirectorylist.com  全球商業目錄和公司目錄
搜索業務,公司,産業 :


國家名單
美國公司目錄
加拿大企業名單
澳洲商業目錄
法國公司名單
意大利公司名單
西班牙公司目錄
瑞士商業列表
奧地利公司目錄
比利時商業目錄
香港公司列表
中國企業名單
台灣公司列表
阿拉伯聯合酋長國公司目錄


行業目錄
美國產業目錄














  • Why . . . ? vs. Why is it that . . . ? - English Language Usage Stack . . .
    Why not: I don't know why, but it seems to me Bob would sound a bit strange if he said, "Why is it that you have to get going?" Eliminating 'that' before 'Bob' would seem to be more in context with the criticism of the way Bob sounds This beside the point that "Why do you have to get going?" is more direct
  • What do we call the “rd” in “3ʳᵈ” and the “th” in “9ᵗʰ”?
    @WS2 In speech, very nearly always In writing, much less so I think what may be going on is that one just assumes that “June 1” is pronounced “June First”, or “4 July” as “the Fourth of July”
  • pronunciation - Why is colonel pronounced kernel? - English . . .
    Why does stat show different timezones corresponding to different files? Can I travel on holiday to the US if I was born in Iran but never had Iranian citizenship, passport but I do have my British passport - Trumps new ban
  • Where does the use of why as an interjection come from?
    Why no, no more then reason The OED doesn't explain why it is used in that manner I can only speculate First it was just a question expressing doubt reduced to its essence: It is best that we negotiate a truce with Spain — Why is that so? I believe the Spanish armies cannot threaten us They will fail in their attempt to conquer England
  • grammaticality - Is it incorrect to say, Why cannot. . . . ? - English . . .
    There are also many examples of "Why we cannot", but they are not interrogatives JForrest explains that 'cannot' is the negative form of 'can', and so 'cannot' should be placed in the same location as 'can' would be in a sentence Since we can say "Why can we grow taller?", "Why cannot we grow taller?" is a logical and properly written negative
  • writing - thats why in formal essays - English Language Usage . . .
    Towards the end of the century, that is why was predominantly the phrase to use In the 1950s, there was a trend reversal so that about 1982, that's why seems to have started gaining wider acceptance and usage We may have to infer that today, writers prefer the contraction over the longer idiomatic phrase
  • grammaticality - Is Why to. . . . . . grammatical? - English Language . . .
    Why (which has no counterpart in ·ever) appears freely in the interrogative construction, as in This is why I’m leaving, but is marginally possible in the pseudo-cleft: Why I’m leaving is that because there’s no opportunity to use any initiative It does not occur elsewhere in fused relatives
  • Who, what, where, when, why, how. Why so many Whs?
    @RegDwight: [g] in где is historically the result of voicing [k] before the voiced consonant [d] (after [ъ] fell out in the initial interrogative sequence къ-); in что, [kь] underwent palatlization, whereas the -ъ- vs -ь- distinction in к[ъ]то "who" vs к[ь]то "what" was initially probably the distinction between two declination models, one for masculine, the other for neuter




企業名錄,公司名錄
企業名錄,公司名錄 copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer