|
Canada-0-BAILIFFS 公司名錄
|
公司新聞:
- Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer . . .
Wherever you stand on age verification laws or Dylan's code change, the response he received is unwarranted Harassment, doxxing, and death threats have no place in any community, let alone one that prides itself on openness and collaboration
- Systemd birth date field triggers forking | Cybernews
The Linux community is forking the core system component systemd in protest after maintainers approved an optional user birthdate field to comply with new age verification laws
- SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification . . .
SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification Field, Suggests Installer-Level Disabling (itsfoss com) 155 Posted by EditorDavid on Saturday March 28, 2026 @06:34PM from the init-to-win-it dept
- Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer . . .
So lets think, what is the real issue going on here? The real issue is that these distros are hosted on GitHub, which is a Microsoft company, and they will comply in a heartbeat and take that shit down if the software is against the law
- SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification . . .
It's FOSS interviewed a software engineer whose long-running open source contributions include Python code for the Arch Linux installer and maintaining packages for NixOS But "a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight" after he'd added the optional birthDate field for systemd's user database Critics saw it not merely as a technical addition, but as a symbolic
- Linux community divided over new age verification features in . . .
Systemd now includes a user date-of-birth field for age verification purposesGaruda Linux refuses to enforce age checks, citing no legal obligationTBOTE Project claims Meta contributes significant
- Age checks creep into Linux as systemd gets a DOB field
The change comes after the recent release of systemd 260 but unless it is reverted for some reason, it will be part of systemd 261 One of the justifications is to facilitate the new parental controls in Flatpak, which are still in the draft stage
|
|